Citizenship Coursework on ID cards
ID cards have become a controversial issue in recent news as the issue raises lots of worries and logistical points. The public seem to be torn between whether or not it will be effective use of our country’s money. As it stands, there seems to be a lot of negative feedback and points raised, making the system opposed. ID cards could be useful and couldn’t be. They could tackle Identity theft, aid anti-terrorism measures, prevent illegal working and prevent illegal immigration.
They might be a waste of money and impractical, worsen harassment of ethnic minorities, have little effect on illegal working, have little effect on countering terrorism and could even lead to loss of privacy. The arguments are clearly level, but, types of information that should be present on these cards, is currently swaying the country to oppose the idea. The two articles presented show different aspects of how the ID cards will impact on our communities. Article one, explains how Tony Blair is adamant to get the public to ‘keep an open mind over the new legislation’. Mr.
Blair wants the public to see that he doesn’t want to introduce ID cards yet, but, keep the debate going so that a decision can be reached. The title sets the tone for the entire article, as it is not forceful and almost asks the reader for their support. It also could be taken as forceful, as it implies that Mr. Blair already has the support and wants to have more. This article is totally different to article two as, the second article states facts more and expresses personal opinions, along with, imagination for typical situations if and when the ID cards come into force.
The writer, Mike O’Brien keeps the article in favour of the people as he breaks down all the negative impacts and puts them in to situations, making it easier to see what life will be like with the cards. Mr. O’Brien sees more effective ways of using the country’s money. Mr. O’Brien thinks that the original concept was good, but, due to facts and arguments is clearly opposed. Personally, the idea of identity cards as it stands is good. I think that this will help the country out a lot with issues such as: immigration, identity theft and terrorism.
My personal view is currently opposed to that of the British public, but, I believe a trial should be put forward to see how the country works with the identity cards in motion. Then judging on people’s opinions and general efficiency of the country, it should be decided whether it is best to make them compulsory or, completely scrap the idea. As far as the facts go, I think these need to be proven and we also need to review what information should go on the cards. Maybe, certain things like, religion or medical information need to be taken off as they are not necessary.
Maybe, these things will help make the country a better place if this information is needed to be displayed. The issue of identity cards is a highly important one, and needs to be further discussed and debated. Also, another essential part, is that, democracy is used and we can vote on what we think is best. This will keep the public in the power of what laws or legislations are passed within our country. The future of this idea should be laid into the hands of the people who have to live with it, us people.
In the future, I think we will see a lot of debating and a trial launched, for a specific city or county (to save money). I can not see a motion being passed allowing identity cards to be compulsory. A new idea or a total scrap will most likely be brought forward. It is important that it is trialled or information is reviewed for the idea to work. I would like to see them brought forward, but with politicians, MP’s and adamant public citizens, the future looks bleak for the identity card.